He said...


FamilyCourtChronicles.com Web
She said...

Random photo from RoamingPhotos.com
THE FAMILY COURT PROJECT HAS COME TO A CLOSE. Effective 6/1/08, Family Court Chronicles has become inactive (announcement), and no new information will be added. The page below is retained for archive purposes, but it could be out of date. Upon request, the webmaster will continue to correct significant errors and will consider removing information that is destructively obsolete. (Email: FamilyCourtGuy (at) gmail.com) See Glenn Campbell's home page for his still-active websites.
Kilroy Cafe: Philosophy for the Modern Age
KillroyCafe.com


Home Contents MediaStream
↑News+Blog↑
Entities Newsletters Book Philosophy Photos

Transcript of Testimony

Glenn Campbell Speaking in Opposition to Assembly Bill 147

Below is a verbatim transcript of the testimony of child welfare activist Glenn Campbell at a hearing of the Health and Human Services Committee of the Nevada Assembly. The testimony is routine for about two minutes, then becomes heated.

See previous page for more information on the bill and an audio recording of this testimony.


GLENN CAMPBELL (Witness)

I am Glenn Campbell. I am an independent child welfare activist. I run a website called Family Court Chronicles dot com. I spend a lot of my days in Family Court hanging out, watching dependency cases, watching juvenile justice cases. I know the system pretty well from the inside, from the court side. I think there needs to be an alternate view presented about this bill. I think it is not all good. I think there are significant issues on the other side. I think all of this bill is predicated on one very simple assumption, that group care is good and foster care is bad. [He meant the opposite.] Now, I don't dispute the findings, the scientific findings that long term—long term—group care is bad for children. But on the other side, we don't know much about foster care. Foster care is also in crisis. The little girl Everlyse Cabrera who disappeared, she was not in congregate care; she was in foster care. Foster care also has its minuses. There can be very good group care and very poor foster care. And we don't really know from the standpoint of right now writing the law what's going to be the best solution for a particular child on a particular day. Maybe there's not much good foster care available on a certain day. Well, the caseworker is going to be hamstrung to use that foster care even if the caseworker doesn't have confidence in that foster care. Whereas group care, if you had seen Child Haven eight years ago when I first saw it, that was very well run group care. It was not an orphanage, it was not a Romania orphanage. Because the numbers had been kept down, there was good care taken of these kids and I was very impressed. I had thought of congregate care as something evil, but group care when it is well-run can be a very positive thing, especially for very short stays. It is interesting that in this session we are considering not only this bill but also the full-day kindergarten bill. Now, in that case, we are taking children under six, we're placing them in the care of an institution....

CHAIRWOMAN SHEILA LESLIE

Sir, sir, let's not talk about kindergarten.

CAMPBELL

I am trying to draw parallels. We're saying that institutional care is okay in kindergarten or day care but we're saying it's not okay when keeping the kids overnight.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

Do you have some specific amendments, Mr. Campbell, that you would like to submit to the committee, because that would be [unintelligible]

CAMPBELL

No, I am voicing opposition. I think that if the committee is going to fairly consider this bill, they ought to consider opposing viewpoints. Isn't that correct, Ms. Chairwoman?

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

Well, we are.

CAMPBELL

Since I'm the only one here...

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

[Uninteligible] specific suggestions.

CAMPBELL

My specific suggestion is do not pass this bill.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

Great, okay, thank you for your testimony.

CAMPBELL

Would you like to hear my reasons for this?

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

I think you've already [given them].

CAMPBELL

You're saying, Ms. Chairman, that you're not going to allow a full debate on this bill.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

I'm saying that in fifteen minutes we have another bill.

CAMPBELL

I am the only person who's opposing this bill, yet you are suppressing my testimony.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

And you're wasting time saying that. I'll give you two minutes to make your points. Go ahead.

CAMPBELL

My points cannot be made in two minutes. I need five minutes.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

Well, you're not going to get five minutes, so would you like your two minutes?

CAMPBELL

I will take whatever I can get. I mean...

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

You're wasting time, sir.

CAMPBELL

Ms. Chairman, I think I'm going to shift this controversy to you, Ms. Chairman.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

[unintelligible aside to an aide]

CAMPBELL

Ms. Chairman, if you come to a bill, and everybody all the way down the line is opposing this bill [He meant "supporting".] don't we have an obligation to at least appoint a devil's advocate, somebody to say, "Here are the problems with this bill"?

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

I'm waiting to hear them.

CAMPBELL

Okay. Number one, we're taking control away from the commanders in the field. In other words, child welfare is war. Alright? Out here in Las Vegas, it's not this nice situation where you have these nice beautiful homes that you are taking children out of. You're trying to make hard decisions for kids, and they are always going to be traumatic decisions. And there are always going to be problems in the field that the commanders in the field have to resolve. This bill is taking discretion away from those commanders. It's like telling General Patton, okay, go defeat the Nazis, but before you defeat the Nazis, you're going to have to do this, this and this, you're going to have to do things in a certain way. Well, you shouldn't be taking that discretion away from the commanders.

[Pause]

I think... Actually, I think that's all I have to say. I have more to say, but you want to cut me off. And I'm going to leave now.

CHAIRWOMAN LESLIE

Sir, I gave you two minutes. Thank you for your testimony.

[END OF TRANSCRIPT]


NOTE: In the transcript above, Chairwoman Leslie says that "in fifteen minutes we have another bill." Campbell is the VERY LAST witness and the only opponent, but he can't be allowed even five minutes. In theory, those fifteen minutes could have been used to discuss the negative impacts of this bill.

Return to previous page


Add your own comments to this page!
Write a comment below and it will be immediately added to the end of this page.
(Your comments must be relevant to this specific page. Irrelevant comments will be promptly removed.)
Your Comments:
We will correct minor typos and spelling errors but not your grammar.
Who Are You? (Identify yourself any way you want)
If you have further comments or corrections, send them to: FamilyCourtGuy at gmail.com
Or use this Anonymous Comment Form

Top of This Page | Home | News | Entities | Philosophy | Flyers | Photos | Other
Visit Glenn's other websites: RoamingPhotos.com, KilroyCafe.com and FastCarTransport.com,

©2005-07, Glenn Campbell, PO Box 30303, Las Vegas, NV 89173. email: FamilyCourtGuy at gmail.com
This is an independent and unofficial website.
All opinions expressed are those of the webmaster and not any other party.
Information conveyed here is accurate to the best of our knowledge but is not guaranteed.
You should seek your own independent verification of critical information.

THIS WEBSITE IS NOT FREE!
If you use this website for more than one hour (cumulatively),
you are required to pay a user fee of $5 per hour.
MORE INFORMATION

Total page hits at FamilyCourtChronicles.com:

Glenn Campbell's Facebook profile
Page Created: 3/19/07